A Multidisciplinary Assessment of ChatGPT's Knowledge of Amyloidosis: Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Amyloidosis, a rare multisystem condition, often requires complex, multidisciplinary care. Its low prevalence underscores the importance of efforts to ensure the availability of high-quality patient education materials for better outcomes. ChatGPT (OpenAI) is a large language model powered by artificial intelligence that offers a potential avenue for disseminating accurate, reliable, and accessible educational resources for both patients and providers. Its user-friendly interface, engaging conversational responses, and the capability for users to ask follow-up questions make it a promising future tool in delivering accurate and tailored information to patients. OBJECTIVE: We performed a multidisciplinary assessment of the accuracy, reproducibility, and readability of ChatGPT in answering questions related to amyloidosis. METHODS: In total, 98 amyloidosis questions related to cardiology, gastroenterology, and neurology were curated from medical societies, institutions, and amyloidosis Facebook support groups and inputted into ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4. Cardiology- and gastroenterology-related responses were independently graded by a board-certified cardiologist and gastroenterologist, respectively, who specialize in amyloidosis. These 2 reviewers (RG and DCK) also graded general questions for which disagreements were resolved with discussion. Neurology-related responses were graded by a board-certified neurologist (AAH) who specializes in amyloidosis. Reviewers used the following grading scale: (1) comprehensive, (2) correct but inadequate, (3) some correct and some incorrect, and (4) completely incorrect. Questions were stratified by categories for further analysis. Reproducibility was assessed by inputting each question twice into each model. The readability of ChatGPT-4 responses was also evaluated using the Textstat library in Python (Python Software Foundation) and the Textstat readability package in R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing). RESULTS: ChatGPT-4 (n=98) provided 93 (95%) responses with accurate information, and 82 (84%) were comprehensive. ChatGPT-3.5 (n=83) provided 74 (89%) responses with accurate information, and 66 (79%) were comprehensive. When examined by question category, ChatGTP-4 and ChatGPT-3.5 provided 53 (95%) and 48 (86%) comprehensive responses, respectively, to "general questions" (n=56). When examined by subject, ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-3.5 performed best in response to cardiology questions (n=12) with both models producing 10 (83%) comprehensive responses. For gastroenterology (n=15), ChatGPT-4 received comprehensive grades for 9 (60%) responses, and ChatGPT-3.5 provided 8 (53%) responses. Overall, 96 of 98 (98%) responses for ChatGPT-4 and 73 of 83 (88%) for ChatGPT-3.5 were reproducible. The readability of ChatGPT-4's responses ranged from 10th to beyond graduate US grade levels with an average of 15.5 (SD 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: Large language models are a promising tool for accurate and reliable health information for patients living with amyloidosis. However, ChatGPT's responses exceeded the American Medical Association's recommended fifth- to sixth-grade reading level. Future studies focusing on improving response accuracy and readability are warranted. Prior to widespread implementation, the technology's limitations and ethical implications must be further explored to ensure patient safety and equitable implementation.

Hospitalizations and Mortality From Myasthenia Gravis: Trends From 2 US National Datasets

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare neuromuscular disorder where IgG antibodies damage the communication between nerves and muscles, leading to muscle weakness that can be severe and have a significant impact on patients' lives. MG exacerbations include myasthenic crisis with respiratory failure, the most serious manifestation of MG. Recent studies have found MG prevalence increasing, especially in older patients. This study examined trends in hospital admissions and in-hospital mortality for adult patients with MG and readmissions and postdischarge mortality in older (65 years or older) adults with MG. METHODS: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), an all-payer national database of hospital discharges, were used to characterize trends in hospitalizations and in-hospital mortality related to MG exacerbations and MG crisis among adult patients aged 18 years or older. The Medicare Limited Data Set, a deidentified, longitudinal research database with demographic, enrollment, and claims data was used to assess hospitalizations, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and 30-day postdischarge mortality among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older. The study period was 2010-2019. Multinomial logit models and Poisson regression were used to test for significance of trends. RESULTS: Hospitalization rates for 19,715 unique adult patients and 56,822 admissions increased from 2010 to 2019 at an average annualized rate of 4.9% (MG noncrisis: 4.4%; MG crisis: 6.8%; all p < 0.001). Readmission rates were approximately 20% in each study year for both crisis and noncrisis hospitalizations; the in-hospital mortality rate averaged 1.8%. Among patients aged 65 years or older, annualized increases in hospitalizations were estimated at 5.2%, 4.2%, and 7.7% for all, noncrisis, and crisis hospitalizations, respectively (all p < 0.001). The average LOS was stable over the study period, ranging from 11.3 to 13.1 days, but was consistently longer for MG crisis admissions. Mortality among patients aged 65 years or older was higher compared with that in all patients, averaging 5.0% across each of the study years. DISCUSSION: Increasing hospitalization rates suggest a growing burden associated with MG, especially among older adults. While readmission and mortality rates have remained stable, the increasing hospitalization rates indicate that the raw numbers of readmissions-and deaths-are also increasing. Mortality rates are considerably higher in older patients hospitalized with MG.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Versus FcRn Inhibition in Autoimmune Disease.

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE or PLEX) is used in a broad range of autoimmune diseases, with the goal of removing autoantibodies from the circulation. A newer approach for the selective removal of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies is the use of therapeutic molecules targeting the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn). FcRn regulates IgG recycling, and its inhibition results in a marked decrease in circulating autoantibodies of the IgG subtype. The difference between FcRn inhibition and PLEX is often questioned. With anti-FcRn monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and fragments only recently entering this space, limited data are available regarding long-term efficacy and safety. However, the biology of FcRn is well understood, and mounting evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and potential differences among compounds in development is available, allowing us to compare against nonselective plasma protein depletion methods such as PLEX. FcRn inhibitors may have distinct advantages and disadvantages over PLEX in certain scenarios. Use of PLEX is preferred over FcRn inhibition where removal of antibodies other than IgG or when concomitant repletion of missing plasma proteins is needed for therapeutic benefit. Also, FcRn targeting has not yet been studied for use in acute flares or crisis states of IgG-mediated diseases. Compared with PLEX, FcRn inhibition is associated with less invasive access requirements, more specific removal of IgG versus other immunoglobulins without a broad impact on circulating proteins, and any impacts on other therapeutic drug levels are restricted to other mAbs. In addition, the degree of IgG reduction is similar with FcRn inhibitors compared with that afforded by PLEX. Here we describe the scientific literature regarding the use of PLEX and FcRn inhibitors in autoimmune diseases and provide an expert discussion around the potential benefits of these options in varying clinical conditions and scenarios.

A Novel Ergonomic Curette Design Reduces Dental Prophylaxis-Induced Muscle Work and Fatigue.

BACKGROUND: To compare fatigue, comfort, and muscle work associated with the use of two periodontal curettes during scaling: one with a novel adaptive design, the other with a conventional non-adaptive design. METHODS: Twelve hygienists scaled a typodont using two Universal Barnhart 5/6 curettes: (1) a prototype featuring an adaptive silicone-covered handle (Curette A), and (2) a stainless-steel curette (Curette B). Surface Electromyography (sEMG) traced muscle work. Hand positions, fatigue, comfort, pinch, and grasp strength were recorded. Paired t-tests and a repeated measures ANOVA with covariates were tested for differences. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Curette A performed significantly better in all categories. Pinch and grasp strength and fatigue were significantly reduced post-instrumentation for Curette B. Curette A required significantly less (i) total muscle work and (ii) work in individual muscles. Comfort, correct grasp, and blade adaptation were significantly better using Curette A. CONCLUSIONS: A curette featuring a novel adaptive handle design demonstrated significantly improved ergonomic performance. Additional clinical studies are needed to solidify our understanding of the potential short- and long-term benefits of the novel curette handle design. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: A novel adaptive curette handle design that enables the clinician to adapt the instrument across the index finger may reduce musculoskeletal burden and fatigue, as well as improve comfort during periodontal instrumentation.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: This article summarizes the clinical features, diagnostic criteria, differential diagnosis, pathogenesis, and prognosis of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), with insights into the current and future diagnostic and therapeutic interventions for this neuromuscular syndrome. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: GBS is an acute, inflammatory, immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy that encompasses many clinical variants and divergent pathogenic mechanisms that lead to axonal, demyelinating, or mixed findings on electrodiagnostic studies. The type of antecedent infection, the development of pathogenic cross-reactive antibodies via molecular mimicry, and the location of the target gangliosides affect the subtype and severity of the illness. The data from the International GBS Outcome Study have highlighted regional variances, provided new and internationally validated prognosis tools that are beneficial for counseling, and introduced a platform for discussion of GBS-related open questions. New research has been undertaken, including research on novel diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers, which may lead to new therapies. ESSENTIAL POINTS: GBS is among the most frequent life-threatening neuromuscular emergencies in the world. At least 20% of patients with GBS have a poor prognosis and significant residual deficits despite receiving available treatments. Research is ongoing to further understand the pathogenesis of the disorder, find new biomarkers, and develop more effective and specific treatments.

Safety and outcomes with efgartigimod use for acetylcholine receptor-positive generalized myasthenia gravis in clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Multiple novel therapies have been approved for patients with myasthenia gravis. Our aim is to describe the early experience of efgartigimod use in acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ve gMG). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included AChR+ve gMG patients from five major neuromuscular centers who were treated with efgartigimod and had both pre- and post-efgartigimod myasthenia gravis activities of daily living (MG-ADL) scores. Information regarding MG history, concomitant treatment(s), MG-ADL and other MG-specific measures, laboratory data, and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients (M:23, F:14) with a mean age of 65.56 (±14.74) y were included in this cohort. A total of 36/37 patients completed at least one cycle and 28 patients completed at least two cycles of efgartigimod. A total of 72% (26/36) of patients had a clinically meaningful reduction (≥2 point change) in MG-ADL after the completion of the first cycle of efgartigimod (mean pre-efgartigimod 8.02) (±3.09) versus post-efgartigimod 4.33 (±3.62). Twenty-five percent (9/36) achieved minimal symptom expression status after one cycle and 25% (7/28) after the second cycle. Treatment benefit was sustained after cycle 2. Three out of four patients with thymoma in this cohort had clinically significant reductions in MG-ADL scores. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels decreased by about 60% (n = 10). One patient had a relapse of Clostridium difficile infection resulting in the discontinuation of therapy. Four patients had mild side effects. DISCUSSION: Efgartigimod led to clinically meaningful improvement in MG-ADL in diverse AChR+ve gMG patients but treatment frequency to achieve optimal symptom control needs to be explored.

Impact of social determinants of health on individuals living with generalized myasthenia gravis and implications for patient support programs.

Introduction: Social determinants of health (SDOH) are important contributors to health outcomes, and better understanding their impact on individuals diagnosed with rare, chronic diseases with high burden and unmet need is critical. Characterizing SDOH burden can help improve the design of patient support programs (PSPs), using targeted approaches to remove barriers to access. Methods: This study used a mixed-methods strategy employing a quantitative survey, which was designed based on qualitative interviews, to understand the unmet needs and awareness/utilization of PSPs among individuals living with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) and experiencing SDOH barriers. The survey was completed by 38 individuals living with gMG, of which the majority were non-White/Caucasian, unemployed, low income, and enrolled in public insurance. Common SDOH challenges, awareness/utilization of available PSPs, and unmet needs were identified. Results: Financial and mental health concerns were the most common among individuals living with gMG and experiencing SDOH barriers throughout diagnosis, accessing treatment, initiating treatment, and continuing treatment. Awareness and utilization of existing support services were low, especially when accessing treatment. Educational, financial, and personalized support with high "human touch" were commonly perceived as the most valuable resources. Implications: To better serve the needs of individuals with gMG experiencing SDOH barriers, PSPs should use a targeted approach to offer services tailored to harder-to-reach populations. Further, providers, advocacy groups, manufacturers, and public organizations in the gMG ecosystem should strengthen collaborations with PSPs to enable individuals living with gMG to access the services they need to improve their health outcomes.

Measuring Overall Severity of Myasthenia Gravis (MG): Evidence for the Added Value of the MG Symptoms PRO.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate measurement of myasthenia gravis (MG) severity is required for appropriate clinical monitoring of patients with MG and assessment of the benefit of new treatments in clinical trials. Our objective was to explore how MG severity can be measured and to determine how the newly developed MG Symptoms Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) instrument complements the available measures of MG severity. METHODS: The conceptual coverage of the Quantitative MG (QMG), MG Composite (MGC), MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), and MG Symptoms PRO was scrutinized against core symptoms of MG: muscle weakness in three muscle groups (ocular, bulbar, and respiratory), muscle weakness fatigability, and physical fatigue. Post hoc analyses of the MG0002 study, a Phase 2a clinical trial of rozanolixizumab in adults with moderate to severe generalized MG, included correlation and Rasch model analyses. RESULTS: The qualitative appraisal highlighted that only the MG Symptoms PRO captured physical fatigue. Data from 541 assessments (43 unique patients) were used for the analyses. Correlations ranged between 0.56 and 0.74 for the MG-ADL, QMG, MGC, and MG Symptoms PRO Muscle Weakness Fatigability score, and between 0.20 and 0.71 for the MG Symptoms PRO scores focusing on independent muscle groups. Analyses with the Rasch model estimated a meaningful continuum of severity of MG, including all items, except ocular muscles, from the four instruments. The QMG and MG Symptoms PRO had the broadest coverage of the MG severity continuum. Muscle fatigability and physical fatigue were more characteristic of low severity while bulbar weakness indicated more severe MG. CONCLUSION: The severity of MG can be reflected in a meaningful continuum underpinned by the MG-specific outcome measures. Only ocular muscle manifestations were shown to reflect a possibly different facet of MG severity. With its modular nature and comprehensive content, the MG Symptoms PRO provides complementary information to the outcome measures widely used in MG. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03052751.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic disease affecting the communication between nerves and muscles. People with MG experience muscle weakness that worsens after activity and improves after rest. MG can affect different groups of body muscles (e.g., around the eyes, in the limbs, and face or throat).We show that the various symptoms of MG can be used to summarize the overall severity of the disease: people with mild and moderate MG often report only the fast onset of weakness in their limb muscles and mild physical fatigue, while those with more severe MG report more severe fatigue and also difficulties associated with weakness in facial and throat muscles (leading to difficulty with swallowing or speaking) and in respiratory muscles (making breathing difficult). This ordering of MG manifestations will help create more accurate methods to assess the severity of MG that can be used to evaluate new treatments or to monitor patients in the clinic.We also suggest that weakness of muscles around the eyes (leading to eyelid drooping or double vision) may represent a unique aspect of MG, and may not provide as much information to summarize the severity of MG as other symptoms. However, this needs further investigation as our study did not include participants who had weakness in eye muscles as their only symptom.We also document the ability of the MG Symptoms Patient-Reported Outcome questionnaire, a new questionnaire completed by patients, to provide useful information for measuring the severity of MG.

Safety and efficacy of rozanolixizumab in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis (MycarinG): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adaptive phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Generalised myasthenia gravis is a chronic, unpredictable, and debilitating autoimmune disease. New treatments for this disease are needed because conventional therapies have limitations, such as side-effects (eg, increased infection risk) or inadequate control of symptoms. Rozanolixizumab is a neonatal Fc receptor blocker that might provide a novel therapeutic option for myasthenia gravis. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of rozanolixizumab for generalised myasthenia gravis. METHODS: MycarinG is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adaptive phase 3 study done at 81 outpatient centres and hospitals in Asia, Europe, and North America. We enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) with acetylcholine receptor (AChR) or muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) autoantibody-positive generalised myasthenia gravis (Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America class II-IVa), a Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score of at least 3 (non-ocular symptoms), and a quantitative myasthenia gravis score of at least 11. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous infusions once a week for 6 weeks of either rozanolixizumab 7 mg/kg, rozanolixizumab 10 mg/kg, or placebo. Randomisation was stratified by AChR and MuSK autoantibody status. Investigators, patients, and people assessing outcomes were masked to random assignments. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to day 43 in MG-ADL score, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03971422) and EudraCT (2019-000968-18); an open-label extension study has been completed (NCT04124965; EudraCT 2019-000969-21) and another is underway (NCT04650854; EudraCT 2020-003230-20). FINDINGS: Between June 3, 2019, and June 30, 2021, 300 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 200 were enrolled. 66 (33%) were randomly assigned to rozanolixizumab 7 mg/kg, 67 (34%) to rozanolixizumab 10 mg/kg, and 67 (34%) to placebo. Reductions in MG-ADL score from baseline to day 43 were greater in the rozanolixizumab 7 mg/kg group (least-squares mean change -3·37 [SE 0·49]) and in the rozanolixizumab 10 mg/kg group (-3·40 [0·49]) than with placebo (-0·78 [0·49]; for 7 mg/kg, least-squares mean difference -2·59 [95% CI -4·09 to -1·25], p<0·0001; for 10 mg/kg, -2·62 [-3·99 to -1·16], p<0·0001). TEAEs were experienced by 52 (81%) of 64 patients treated with rozanolixizumab 7 mg/kg, 57 (83%) of 69 treated with rozanolixizumab 10 mg/kg, and 45 (67%) of 67 treated with placebo. The most frequent TEAEs were headache (29 [45%] patients in the rozanolixizumab 7 mg/kg group, 26 [38%] in the rozanolixizumab 10 mg/kg group, and 13 [19%] in the placebo group), diarrhoea (16 [25%], 11 [16%], and nine [13%]), and pyrexia (eight [13%], 14 [20%], and one [1%]). Five (8%) patients in the rozanolixizumab 7 mg/kg group, seven (10%) in the rozanolixizumab 10 mg/kg group, and six (9%) in the placebo group had a serious TEAE. No deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: Rozanolixizumab showed clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported and investigator-assessed outcomes in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis, for both 7 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg doses. Both doses were generally well tolerated. These findings support the mechanism of action of neonatal Fc receptor inhibition in generalised myasthenia gravis. Rozanolixizumab represents a potential additional treatment option for patients with generalised myasthenia gravis. FUNDING: UCB Pharma.

Addressing Outcome Measure Variability in Myasthenia Gravis Clinical Trials.

An increasing number of clinical trials are enrolling patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). A lack of standardization in the performance of outcome measures leads to confusion among site research teams and is a source of variability in clinical trial data. MGNet, the NIH-supported Rare Disease Clinical Research Network for MG, views standardization of MG outcome measures as a critical need. To address this issue, a group of experts summarized key outcome measures used in MG clinical trials and a symposium was convened to address issues contributing to outcome measure variability. Consensus recommendations resulted in changes to outcome measure instructions and, in some cases, modifications to specific instruments. Recommended changes were posted for public commentary before finalization. Changes to the MG-Activities of Daily Living, MG-Quality of Life-15r, and MG-Impairment Index were limited to adding details to the administration instructions. Recommendations for proper positioning of participants and how to score items that could not be performed because of non-MG reasons were provided for the MG Composite. The Quantitative MG (QMG) score required the most attention, and changes were made both to the instructions and the performance of certain items resulting in the QMG-Revised. The Postintervention Status was believed to have a limited role in clinical trials, except for the concept of minimal manifestation status. As a next step, training materials and revised source documents, which will be freely available to study teams, will be created and posted on the MGNet website. Further studies are needed to validate changes made to the QMG-Revised.

Primary lateral sclerosis natural history study - planning, designing, and early enrollment.

Introduction/Aims. Primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) is exceedingly rare and has been an enigmatic disease. Recent progress has drastically changed this perception, with early biomarkers being investigated and potential medications for PLS emerging at the preclinical stage. The aim of this paper is to describe a study of PLS natural history and discuss the limitations and proposed solutions to the study of a rare and slowly progressive disease. Methods. The PLS Natural History Study is a 30-site, 24-month, prospective study that is supported by multiple funding sources. The study aims to enroll 50 early PLS (disease duration ≤4 years) and 50 definite PLS (disease duration 4 to 15 years) participants using modified PLS Diagnostic Criteria. Smartphone-based assessments including semi-quantitative and quantitative measures and patient-reported outcomes are utilized. In-person quantitative measures are also completed during site visits. The change in the PLS Functional Rating Scale score is the primary outcome. The study utilizes the NeuroBANK® patient-centric data capture and management platform. The biostatistical analysis plan has been developed. Results. In one year, 28 participants have been recruited. Enrollment has been much slower than anticipated due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the rarity of PLS, and potential study competition for internal resources from ALS clinical trials. Discussion. We discuss the need for more innovative methods to enroll and study individuals with such rare diseases and propose a number of mechanisms by which more efficient enrollment could be facilitated.

Randomized Phase 2 Study of ACE-083 in Patients With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether locally acting ACE-083 is safe, well tolerated, and increases muscle volume, motor function, and quality of life (QoL) in adults with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) type 1. METHODS: This phase 2 study enrolled adults with CMT1 or CMTX (N=63). Part 1 was open-label and evaluated safety and tolerability of different dose levels of ACE-083 for use in Part 2. Part 2 was a randomized, placebo-controlled, 6-month study of 240 mg/muscle ACE-083 injected bilaterally in the tibialis anterior muscle, followed by a 6-month, open-label extension in which all patients received ACE-083. Pharmacodynamic endpoints included total muscle volume (TMV; primary endpoint), contractile muscle volume (CMV), and fat fraction. Additional secondary endpoints included 6-minute walk test, 10-meter walk/run, muscle strength, and QoL. Safety was assessed with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and clinical laboratory tests. RESULTS: In Part 1 (n=18), ACE-083 was generally safe and well tolerated at all dose levels, with no serious AEs, TEAEs ≥Grade 3, or death reported. In Part 2 (n=45 enrolled, n=44 treated), there was significantly greater change in TMV with ACE-083 compared with placebo (LS mean difference: 13.5%; p = 0.0096). There was significant difference between ACE-083 and placebo for CMV and change in ankle dorsiflexion strength. Fat fraction and all other functional outcomes were not significantly improved by ACE-083. Moderate-to-mild injection-site reactions were the most common TEAEs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite significantly increased TMV and CMV, patients with CMT receiving ACE-083 in tibialis anterior muscles did not demonstrate greater functional improvement compared with those receiving placebo. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that intramuscular ACE-083 is safe, well tolerated, and increases total muscle volume after 6 months of treatment in adults with CMT1 or CMTX.

Patient preference for virtual versus in-person visits in neuromuscular clinical practice.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: It is unknown if patients with neuromuscular diseases prefer in-person or virtual telemedicine visits. We studied patient opinions and preference on virtual versus in-person visits, and the factors influencing such preferences. METHODS: Telephone surveys, consisting of 11 questions, of patients from 10 neuromuscular centers were completed. RESULTS: Five hundred and twenty surveys were completed. Twenty-six percent of respondents preferred virtual visits, while 50% preferred in-person visits. Sixty-four percent reported physical interaction as "very important." For receiving a new diagnosis, 55% preferred in-person vs 35% reporting no preference. Forty percent were concerned about a lack of physical examination vs 20% who were concerned about evaluating vital signs. Eighty four percent reported virtual visits were sufficiently private. Sixty eight percent did not consider expenses a factor in their preference. Although 92% were comfortable with virtual communication technology, 55% preferred video communications, and 19% preferred phone calls. Visit preference was not significantly associated with gender, diagnosis, disease severity, or symptom management. Patients who were concerned about a lack of physical exam or assessment of vitals had significantly higher odds of selecting in-person visits than no preference. DISCUSSION: Although neither technology, privacy, nor finance burdened patients in our study, more patients preferred in-person visits than virtual visits and 40% were concerned about a lack of physical examination. Interactions that occur with in-person encounters had high importance for patients, reflecting differences in the perception of the patient-physician relationship between virtual and in-person visits.

Intron mutations and early transcription termination in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy.

DMD pathogenic variants for Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy are detectable with high sensitivity by standard clinical exome analyses of genomic DNA. However, up to 7% of DMD mutations are deep intronic and analysis of muscle-derived RNA is an important diagnostic step for patients who have negative genomic testing but abnormal dystrophin expression in muscle. In this study, muscle biopsies were evaluated from 19 patients with clinical features of a dystrophinopathy, but negative clinical DMD mutation analysis. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or high-throughput RNA sequencing methods identified 19 mutations with one of three pathogenic pseudoexon types: deep intronic point mutations, deletions or insertions, and translocations. In association with point mutations creating intronic splice acceptor sites, we observed the first examples of DMD pseudo 3'-terminal exon mutations causing high efficiency transcription termination within introns. This connection between splicing and premature transcription termination is reminiscent of U1 snRNP-mediating telescripting in sustaining RNA polymerase II elongation across large genes, such as DMD. We propose a novel classification of three distinct types of mutations identifiable by muscle RNA analysis, each of which differ in potential treatment approaches. Recognition and appropriate characterization may lead to therapies directed toward full-length dystrophin expression for some patients.

Reldesemtiv in Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy: a Phase 2 Hypothesis-Generating Study.

This phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, hypothesis-generating study evaluated the effects of oral reldesemtiv, a fast skeletal muscle troponin activator, in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Patients ≥ 12 years of age with type II, III, or IV SMA were randomized into 2 sequential, ascending reldesemtiv dosing cohorts (cohort 1: 150 mg bid or placebo [2:1]; cohort 2: 450 mg bid or placebo [2:1]). The primary objective was to determine potential pharmacodynamic effects of reldesemtiv on 8 outcome measures in SMA, including 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP). Changes from baseline to weeks 4 and 8 were determined. Pharmacokinetics and safety were also evaluated. Patients were randomized to reldesemtiv 150 mg, 450 mg, or placebo (24, 20, and 26, respectively). The change from baseline in 6MWD was greater for reldesemtiv 450 mg than for placebo at weeks 4 and 8 (least squares [LS] mean difference, 35.6 m [p = 0.0037] and 24.9 m [p = 0.058], respectively). Changes from baseline in MEP at week 8 on reldesemtiv 150 and 450 mg were significantly greater than those on placebo (LS mean differences, 11.7 [p = 0.038] and 13.2 cm H2O [p = 0.03], respectively). For 6MWD and MEP, significant changes from placebo were seen in the highest reldesemtiv peak plasma concentration quartile (Cmax > 3.29 µg/mL; LS mean differences, 43.3 m [p = 0.010] and 28.8 cm H2O [p = 0.0002], respectively). Both dose levels of reldesemtiv were well tolerated. Results suggest reldesemtiv may offer clinical benefit and support evaluation in larger SMA patient populations.

Clinical Effects of the Self-administered Subcutaneous Complement Inhibitor Zilucoplan in Patients With Moderate to Severe Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Results of a Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Importance: Many patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) have substantial clinical disability, persistent disease burden, and adverse effects attributable to chronic immunosuppression. Therefore, there is a significant need for targeted, well-tolerated therapies with the potential to improve disease control and enhance quality of life. Objective: To evaluate the clinical effects of zilucoplan, a subcutaneously (SC) self-administered macrocyclic peptide inhibitor of complement component 5, in a broad population of patients with moderate to severe gMG. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial at 25 study sites across North America recruited participants between December 2017 and August 2018. Fifty-seven patients were screened, of whom 12 did not meet inclusion criteria and 1 was lost to follow-up after randomization but before receiving study drug, resulting in a total of 44 acetylcholine receptor autoantibody (AChR-Ab)-positive patients with gMG with baseline Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores of at least 12, regardless of treatment history. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to a daily SC self-injection of placebo, 0.1-mg/kg zilucoplan, or 0.3-mg/kg zilucoplan for 12 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary and key secondary end points were the change from baseline to week 12 in QMG and MG Activities of Daily Living scores, respectively. Significance testing was prespecified at a 1-sided α of .10. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results: The study of 44 patients was well balanced across the 3 treatment arms with respect to key demographic and disease-specific variables. The mean age of patients across all 3 treatment groups ranged from 45.5 to 54.6 years and most patients were white (average proportions across 3 treatment groups: 78.6%-86.7%). Clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in primary and key secondary efficacy end points were observed. Zilucoplan at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg SC daily resulted in a mean reduction from baseline of 6.0 points in the QMG score (placebo-corrected change, -2.8; P = .05) and 3.4 points in the MG Activities of Daily Living score (placebo-corrected change, -2.3; P = .04). Clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements were also observed in other secondary end points, the MG Composite and MG Quality-of-Life scores. Outcomes for the 0.1-mg/kg SC daily dose were also statistically significant but slower in onset and less pronounced than with the 0.3-mg/kg dose. Rescue therapy (intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange) was required in 3 of 15, 1 of 15, and 0 of 14 participants in the placebo, 0.1-mg/kg zilucoplan, and 0.3-mg/kg zilucoplan arms, respectively. Zilucoplan was observed to have a favorable safety and tolerability profile. Conclusions and Relevance: Zilucoplan yielded rapid, meaningful, and sustained improvements over 12 weeks in a broad population of patients with moderate to severe AChR-Ab-positive gMG. Near-complete complement inhibition appeared superior to submaximal inhibition. The observed safety and tolerability profile of zilucoplan was favorable. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03315130.